SUNDAY OBSERVER VESAK ARTICLE

-
Please click link below

http://epaper.sundayobserver.lk/art.asp?id=2018/04/29/pg20_1&pt=p&h=

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Beyond the Internal and External: Using Gocara and Vemattatā to Dismantle the Self

-
Image
  The Wisdom of the Khajjaneeya Sutta A translation based on a discussion by Venerable Alawwe Anomadassi Thero : Version 2 The core of the Buddha’s teaching in the Khajjaneeya Sutta (SN 22.79) focuses on a radical shift in perspective: moving from seeing "things" (nouns) to seeing "processes" (verbs/actions). This shift dismantles the illusion of a solid self ( Sakkaya ) and the artificial duality of internal versus external. 1. The Nature of Consciousness and Naming In the Khajjaneeya Sutta , the Buddha defines consciousness through its function: “Vijanatiti kho bhikkhave, tasmā viññāṇanti vuccathi”   ( It cognizes, monks; that is why it is called 'consciousness'. ) Just as we use nouns like "table" or "chair" for communication, we use terms like "falling sick" or "dying." These are designations ( pannațți ), expressions ( vohāra ), and linguistic conventions ( nirutti ). We cannot have a name without a circu...
Read more

From Concepts to Vision: Beyond the Method

-
Image
  This article is based on a translation of an extract from a recent Dhamma discussion regarding the nature of inquiry and the perception of impermanence. The other day, we explored how to truly examine the mind and meditate with inquiry. A major obstacle surfaced: we often attempt to practice a "method" that is merely a conceptual label, rather than engaging with the actual method itself. I urged you to meditate on impermanence ( anicca ) to support your internal vision, rather than becoming entangled in terminology. The Paradox: Communication vs. Practice The Buddha disclosed the Dhamma to the world in a way it is easily communicated. In that sense, it is a "worldly practice"—it uses our language and our concepts. However, there is a subtle but vital distinction to be made: while the Dhamma is explained to the world so it can be understood, the actual practice should not be a "worldly" one. When we adopt a meditation method based on our worldly habits, i...
Read more

Knowing the Eye: An Inquiry into Consciousness

-
Image
  An extract from a discussion between Venerable Alawwe Anomadassi Thero and few lay disciples Knowing the Eye: An Inquiry into Consciousness Q: When we speak of "knowing of the eye," does it refer to what is known by the eye (form), or does "knowing the eye" refer to knowing an eye that already exists? Could it be both, since consciousness is inherently the nature of knowing? I’ve considered that if the eye doesn't know it is an eye, and the form doesn't know it is a form, how do we know anything? Does consciousness only arise when "I" creeps in, turning the eye and form into named conventions ( nama-rupa )? A: The Buddha preached the Dhamma with reference to our experiential world. Those who are not satyavadi (truthful) assume that things exist independently for an "I" to encounter. For such individuals, how a vimutti-kami (one desiring liberation) relates to the world remains beyond comprehension. The parlance of those who ...
Read more